Alkebulan (Africa) Map...I Love this

Made by a Swede called Nikolaj Cyan.....

...and for any who don't believe something when your own people say it, here's some Europeans telling you....

Easter Island heads in the British Museum

The British stole a Easter Island head back in the day...it's on display in the British Museum - here are some pics.....

Plus here's an 'Egyptian' (

33 Whigmore Street

There's a street in London called 'Whigmore St'...this building happens to be at number 33....

Latest Painting....'The Empress'

Just finished the final touches on my latest painting. It's called 'The Empress'....it's taken about 9 months to finish, and it's my first major piece that I have created entirely from my own imagination...enjoy :)......

Holographic Universe

So, the whole universe is actually in-fact one giant hologram - I thought I'd just kick off this post by going in straight at the deep end - it seemed like the best way. For those who don't know what a hologram actually is oxford online dictionaries define it as 'A three-dimensional image formed by the interference of light beams from a laser or other coherent light source'...to put it in layman's terms a hologram is an image which is produced by light, and looks different depending on the angle that you view it from. So the image on a TV isn't a hologram as if you move to the side of the screen and view it from an angle the image still looks that same. If you do the same thing for a tree or a person, then you will see a slightly different image as you move around it. This is simple stuff I hear you say - of course when you move around a tree it's gonna look different from different angles - it's 3D, that's what 3 dimensional objects do, however bear in mind that a hologram is also a 'projection' from a 'light source'.

So let's look at those two other aspects of holograms, and explain them in relation to the universe: First, let's look at 'light source' - light is energy, and most conscious people already know that everything is made out of energy. So that's cleared that one up. Ok, so what about the projection part - if the universe is a projection of energy that we perceive as mostly 3 dimensional objects, then where is this projection coming from. The answer is closer than you think. The projection is coming from you - us, everyone. Now this is where it gets a bit deep. Our minds are constantly projecting out thoughts, like a radio broadcast antenna. These thoughts are actually projections of energy, similar to when you drop a stone into water and the ripples go out. Our thoughts go out from ourselves, and not only to they help to shape the environment/universe, as our thoughts permeate far and wide (especially positive thoughts, which are more powerful than negative ones), but they also provide the actual particles that the universe is made up of. Think about it - we are constantly taking in energy in different forms - food, water, air, sound, light - the last two are absorbed by our bodies not only through our eyes and ears, but through our entire bodies, which is why we tan (highly melanated and non-highly melanated people all included) when in the sun for long periods. All of that energy that we absorb has to be put out somehow, and we put it out via breathing, sweating, excretion (sorry, if you're having lunch :), speaking (sound waves), and thinking. Melanin (or Carbon) is a superconductor, which is why we as highly melanated people are the most influential people in terms of shaping the universe - we actually shape and create the universe with our thoughts, and words ('let there be light').

If all melanated people in the world concentrated on the same thing for 20 minutes, that thing would happen. When one of use does it, it still happens, but it takes what seems like longer (I'll expand on the illusion of time in another post) to manifest as there are so many other thoughts, some of which may be conflicting, for our own thought process to navigate through.

Here's a scientific article based on what I have just been talking about if you wanna research further - you can also look up Sonia Barrett on youtube, as she talks a lot about this subject

http://rt.com/news/space-evidence-universe-hologram-195/

Divine Retribution for professional Brazilian football

So Brazil, once the benchmark by which all football related flair was judge have been astonishingly humiliated at a World Cup semi final that they staged in their own backyard. From the moment the first shambles of a goal went in, an incredible weakness within the Brazilian team's ranks was exposed, and the German team ensured that this one one humiliation that Brazil's national team would not be able to duck, or cover up. For me, the nature of the defeat, if defeat is even enough of a word to describe what happened to the Brazilian national team last night, makes the likelihood of divine intervention in last night's events the most plausible explanation for what transpired. Never before in a game of that magnitude have I witnessed a demolition such as the one which I witnessed during the first half of last night's semi final. Brazil shipped 5 goals in the space of around twenty minutes - this is the kind of thing that you would expect Germany or Brazil themselves to be doing to a Faeroe Island or San Marino team, and even now, to be fair to the development of those teams, this kind of spectacle would be unlikely to occur.

It wasn't just the fact that they shipped 5 goals so quickly - it was also, for me, the manner of the goals. Brazil looked weak, and afraid - they could hardly pass the ball to each other. None of Germany's goals in the first half (I don't know about the second half, cos I had switched off by around 60 minutes) were 30 yard screamers, or thunderous headers, or involved any pieces of incredible skill - three out of the five goals, if I remember correctly, were simply passed into the net by the German players.

Divine retribution is the most likely explanation for me as professional Brazilian football, as an industry, has for decades now committed numerous offences against the national people of Brazil, and now I'm going to go through a few of them....

1. Firstly, it must be remember that 8 workers passed form whilst working on building the stadiums for this world cup. This is something that I haven't heard mentioned once throughout all of the coverage of the tournament, and being a football lover, I have watched almost every game of this tournament. It would have been fitting for the players, or officials, or both to do some kind of memorial for those workers at the beginning of the tournament, and if they did do one then I apologise, but having watched the whole of the opening ceremony, again, I did not see one mention for them. May they rest in peace.

2. The cost of staging the world cup. This article by the Bleacher report http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1845944-how-much-has-hosting-the-world-cup-cost-brazil says that Bloomberg have estimated the cost of staging the tournament to be around $14 billion. There were riots and mass protests last year about this very subject. Who's knows how much Fifa has made from it, over and under the table.

3. The lack of Moorish influence in the Brazilian national team. Throughout the decades every brazilian national team has been very melanated. If you look at the pictures of the nationals teams I've shown below you'll see that most of them are made up by at least 50% of very melanated players. It does however, become less melanated as the teams get closer to the modern day, and the team which played yesterday was arguably the least melanated a Brazil team to have ever contested a world cup semi final, and let it not be forgotten that Pele himself is highly melanated Moor...

1958

1962

1966

1970

1974

1978

1982

2014

"Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land"

4. Then we have the concentration on a European style of play. Why would the 5 times winners of the world cup feel that they need to change their style of play in order to 'keep up' with the rest of world in terms of football? There is a lot more to the Brazilian adoption of the European style of play, and desire for their players to be more 'physical' in build than I will go into at this time - that can be left for it's own post. But I will say now that it is my reckoning that it is related to the rise of German football, and later Spanish football, as well as the Nazis who went to Brazil in operation Paperclip. Needless to say that the change of style has clearly been unbeneficial to the success of the national team.

5. Nike's sponsorship of the Brazilian national team. For a more in depth look into this point check out this article from the Guradian http://www.theguardian.com/media/2001/jul/09/marketingandpr.worldcupfootball2002. Brazil reputedly had/have a contract with Brazil that Nike can chose 5 internationals for Brazil to play each year where at least 8 first team regulars must be present. Getting involved with Nike, for any sportsman or team is never a good idea, and it is no coincidence that Brazil's decline has correlated with their increased involvement with Nike.

Useful and Information Moorish Websites

With so many websites (including this one) that are now out there providing Moorish related information it can be hard to know where to go to find what you are looking for. Having read quite a few of them myself here's my list of the websites that I consider the most helpful and informative...

1. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/

This list isn't in any particular order of rank, with the exception of 1st place, which is taken by the undisputed champion that is RVBey Publications. Ran by the fantastic Rasmariah Bey, Taj Tarik Bey, Anaid El, and others it contains a wealth of moorish related information that is not only precise, and very accurate, but is also being continuously updated. On here you will find history and nationality lessons, news on current affairs, techniques on how to straighten out certain areas of your life in respect to the law, and my favourite aspect, many free to download letter templates that can be put to use in lots of different situations. Tons of respect goes over to them.

2. www.undergroundrailroadnet.com

Great source for DVDs

3. http://www.dralimelbey.com/united-washitaw-de-dugdahmoundyah-muur-nation-history.html

Fantastic history on the heritage of Moors, especially of the Washitaw in North West Amexem, and in particular Louisiana



...Now, here's a few which are not specifically aimed for Moors, but are really useful for conscoius people, especially those who are consistently active...


4. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com

A fantastic site which allows you to easily make freedom of information requests to any governmental body in Britain. It will manage the request for you, keeping you up to date with progress, and allowing you to easily follow up if you are having issues with your requests. Another fantastic aspect is the database of all other people's requests that you can search through and really find some very useful and interesting information

5. http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org

A fantastic Britannic based site which contains a very popular forum on a wide variety of topics concerning freedom, and law

6. http://www.fmotl.com/forum/index.php

Same as above. Not used as much by me, but still very popular in it's own right.



.....The next two are good websites for finding contact information for companies/corporations that you need to get things straight with....




7. http://www.saynoto0870.com/

Gives you landline numbers for companies for when you want to call them up to sort out your business. Contains a very large database of companies.

8. http://gethuman.com/

Provides multiple options for contacting companies (phone/emails etc). Very good for the hard to reach ones

A lifetime on Natural Foods

If you've ever read the start of the Bible, or even if you haven't, you will probably know about the poeple mentioned in the bible who live to all kinds of seemingly outrageous ages, such as living to be 300 years old and so on. After reading this information during the time that I tried to actually read through the bible, which was in my late teens (I got to about 20 pages in, which I still consider an achievement)  I thought, 'OK, well how could this have actually been possible'. This was not in a way where I was dismissing the information, but in a way where I tried to figure out situations where living to these kinds of ages could be possible. That got me thinking about all of the crap that we, as modern people eat right throughout our lives, and how if we didn't eat so much rubbish, that maybe living to those kinds of ages could be a possibility....

In my teens I was aware, as a lot of us I'm sure are, that most modern day packaged food contain a great amount of unnatural and processed ingredients, such as preservatives, colourings, flavourings, etc. Now we will eat these foods pretty much everyday, if you're living the typically modern life that is, and we also start to intake these foods from a very early age via things such as baby foods, etc. This is true of even some of the best home-cooking, which will usually, most likely involve some kinds of oils, or flours, or tinned ingredients. Then on top of this we have to add the fast foods, and takeaway style meals that we all typically will regularly have when growing up in western society - things such as McDonalds, Fish and Chips, etc.

A lot of us will start to drink alcohol from around the age of 9 or 10 - obviously (and hopefully) not binges or even say whole cans of beer, but maybe a taste of some wine from our parent's glass during a special occasion, or maybe your mum, like mine, would give you a bit of Guinness every now and then. When we hit or teens we then have the ritual (at least in Britain) of going to the park with your friends, with a cheap bottle of cider, and basically just getting drunk for the fun of it. Combine this with drinking at parties, and so on, and by the time we are in our late teens we've developed quite a taste for alcoholic drinks. Finally, add on top of this the smoking, either of cigarettes, or weed, which is now tainted to very undesirable levels with chemicals, and what we end up with is a person who by the time they have hit the age of 20 has already put a vast amount of crap into their bodies.

Now this behaviour, for many of us, continues for many years afterwards (or at least it used to, a lot of us have become a lot more health conscious). This is not to mention the unnecessary stress of modern life, and things such as car pollution etc - if our diet was as good as it could be from the very start of our lives, i.e. eating natural foods, what would the difference be to our lifespans? For a bit of evidence of this check out this Moor, Annette Larkins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTWC2xIIsRs who has lived on fruit and vegetable juices from many years, and who is now in her 70s, but looks like she's in her 40s

....if we just looked at the foods that we eat, and say for each year we live, our western diets take off one year from our lifespans, then, with the so-called average life span being 75 (though I know of one lady who recently celebrated her 100th birthday, so you have to take western averages with a pinch of salt) then if we didn't have all of the crap that we eat throughout our lives we would be living to age 150 - that's just living the same lifestyle but with a vastly improved diet - improve the lifestyle, and who knows what age we could live to.

I have only talked about removing the obvious things from our diet in this post, but there are also many other things which could be improved which may not be so apparent. I advise readers to check out electric foods, alkaline foods, and the work of Dr Sebi, for tons more great information in this area.

Scottish Independence

So with all the news about Scottish independence currently going about I thought I would throw in my 2 cents worth about the subject and at the same time provide a bit of an explanation as to the reasons why this has come about now. This subject, in my opinion, is much more far reaching than is being reported, and it has already had very large consequences in this country...

The basis of Scottish independence is the Treaty of Union 1706 in-which, the story goes, that the Kingdom of England united with the Kingdom of Scotland to form Great Britain, and what would later become the UK or United Kingdom of Great Britain (it wasn't in any way as straightforward as that, as we will see later). So fast forward on to today - the Scottish National Party want to be independent from the UK, and apparently there's going to be a referendum in Scotland about whether to go independent in September. Now, Scotland could only become independent if the treaty was up, or nullified, and in my opinion, based on my research, the treaty is already up, and I will now explain a bit more and provide evidence to back up this statement....

The treaty was formed in 1706 (it was the 'Act' of Union that was passed in 1707). Now the way that the UK government and Monarchy, etc are run is largely Hebrew in nature. For example, you may notice if you look up some treaties from around the 1700s or 1800s that in the introductory section of the treaty they give praise to the 'Most High' - this is a Hebrew term for Ellyon - a deity. There are many other aspects of the government and monarchy which are based around Hebrew culture (e.g. the Banks and the English language itself), but I won't go into them all here. In Hebrew tradition there is something called a 'Jubilee' (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilee_(biblical)). A jubilee states that there are fifty years for an agreement governing the ownership of land to last, and it is in the forty ninth year (which is 7 cycles of 7 years) that a decision is made whether to re-institute the agreement or end it. So, based on the Jubilee cycle, if you kept on going forward in cycles of 50 years from the time the treaty was signed you would eventually reach the year 2006. Obviously, then the 49th year for that particluar Jubilee would be in 2005.

So 2005 would have been the most recent year for the decision to have been made whether or not to continue with the treaty. Now if you have a close look at what was happening, government wise, in 2005 you will find some very interesting things...firstly, and foremost you had a piece of legislation being passed which abolished the feudal land system in 'Scotland' (see... http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2000/5/contents). The feudal (or 'fee' dal) system, for those who don't know is basically the system of land ownership that the vast majority of people living in the western world would have grown up in, whereby the 'state' or Monarch or whoever, claims ownership of all of the land in a country, and then the people or 'citizens' have to pay to live on it - so this system includes the use of mortgages, the of renting property, council tax, etc. Now, passing this kind of legislation is obviously the 'government' saying 'we no-longer have any claim on the land', and to do it in just 'Scotland' is a very big sign.

The second piece of major legislation that I will provide as evidence that the treaty is over is the constitutional reform act of 2005. A major effect of this act was the establishment of a supreme court for the UK, but something else that it also done which I am more interested in is the demotion of the Lord Chief Justice. The Lord chief justice was, prior to the the act, the person in charge of the queen's bench division of the uk court system. The Queen's bench is the 'de jure' court in the UK (or it was prior to 2005). Many other scholars, and lecturers have pointed to the queen's bench as the place to go if you want to work with real law i.e. natural law, as opposed to the commercial law that is in practice in the other 'de facto' courts such as county court, magistrates court, etc. The queen's bench is really run by the monarch, but she or he can appoint someone to act in her place which is why we had the lord chief justice. If you watch the HBO TV series 'Game of Thrones' then the queen's bench would be the equivalent of when the farmers and other townspeople were bringing their greivances and problems to Kalisi after she decided to stay and rule in Meeren. So the queen's bench is like the old time court from before the running of the country (Albion) was taken over by the city of London (the crown).

Now, back to the reform act....the act created a new position called the 'president of the queen's bench' which is currently filled by a guy called Igor Judge. This removed the Lord Chief Justice from the Queen's bench and demoted him to only being head of the court system of england and wales. So, to summarise what actually happened....under the treaty, prior to 2005, the lord chief justice was the head of the UK court system, as the UK was coming to an end there could no-longer be a head of a UK court system, so a new position was created (president of the queen's bench) which now covers the re-instigated Albion aka Alba aka Scotland, and the lord chief justice got bumped down to only being head of England and wales.

A bit more evidence pointing towards the UK coming to an end in 2005...Here are a few governmental agencies which were also formed in 2005 or around that time period....

HMRC
HM Passprt Office (formed in April 2006)
National archives merged with the office of public sector information in 2006

...as you can see, some very integral agencies were re-formed during this time period.

Now to connect the 7/7 incidents with all of this....well firstly you have to understand that the 'idiot circus' as I like to call them, or those better known as the 'establishment' try to use rituals as a means to invoke some sort of power directed towards whatever plan they want to achieve. This can come in many different forms, such as a music concert, a meeting between heads of state, or, as has often been done in the past, a staged so called 'terrorist' attack, or an event of a similar nature. For more in-depth coverage of these types of events, as well as commentary or many other subjects of note, I advise you to listen to the Super Heru Radio show by Aseer the Duke of Tiers http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-duke-of-tiers.

The jubilee tradition states that on the tenth day, of the seventh month, of the seventh year a trumpet should be sounded. Well it wasn't quite the tenth day of July that the 7/7 bombings happened, but it was the seventh month (July) of the seventh year, of the seventh cycle (since 1956) plus, due to the bombings the UK was asked to observe a 2 minute silence on the 10th of July.

So based on all of the evidence presented above, it is my opinion that the treaty of union ended in 2005. Anyone who has further evidence for or against this then please feel free to comment below. The treaty being over would have massive consequences for the people of this nation. I'll have more on that in another post. Also, there would be very significant ramifications for the city of london corporation, i.e. the crown, a lot of which I am still working out myself, and I'll be sure to post on here as soon as I reach any major conclusions.

The Privatisation of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

Her Majesty's Government is a corporation. Before I show the hard evidence, you can always tell what something is from it's actions. If I described an animal that was covered in hair, likes running around after tennis balls, and barked a lot you'd then know that I'm talking about a Dog. Same way if I describe an organisation which the majority of it's actions are to make money, then you know I'm talking about a business. Ok, now here's the hard evidence http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=majesty+&match=contains&CIK=&filenum=&State=&Country=X0&SIC=&owner=exclude&Find=Find+Companies&action=getcompany and for HM Treasury... http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=majesty+&match=contains&CIK=&filenum=&State=&Country=X0&SIC=&owner=exclude&Find=Find+Companies&action=getcompany

Ok, now here's the background....

Noble Drew Ali received the Spanish (Moorish) Land Grant during the Pan American Conference in 1928. Noble Drew Ali was one of the initiators of the Moorish Science Temple of America - a reconstitution of the original Al Moroccan government, which was fully functioning in America prior to the founding of the United States. The Moorish Land Grant (known more popularly as the Spanish land grant) was a grant given to the European powers in 1762 to conduct business in the Western hemisphere. For more information on this area see 'The Return of the Ancient Ones' written by the Empress Verdiacee http://www.dralimelbey.com/united-washitaw-de-dugdahmoundyah-muur-nation-history.html you can also research the Treaty of Paris 1763, the Royal Proclamation 1763, and the French Indian Wars circa 1754-63. The land grant, was just that, a grant of land that was only supposed to be last for a certain period of time - until 2004 if i'm not mistaken. This information was supposed to be hidden from the heirs of the land, the autochthonous, indigenous Moorish people, modernly known as black people. As long as the heirs were in a minority state i.e. thinking we're black people, and not Moors, the Europeans could act as trustees over the land, which basically means they could conduct business, and everything else they've been doing without paying for the privilege of being there. When Noble Drew Ali received evidence of grant it caused a panic amongst the European bankers - Investment bankers who trade on things such as securities, derivatives, and stocks and bonds, are really trading on the estates and energies of the common people. The hub of this, and therefore the most valuable stock, is found in America as it is the North Gate (see the Zodiac). Therefore any major occurrences in the financial market of America has a major effect on the whole world. When news of what Noble Drew Ali had done began getting around the investment bankers began calling in the loans and notes that they were trading thinking that very soon those pieces of paper that they hold would be even more valueless than they were at their creation.

BOE notes are backed by nothing. They have said that they can be exchanged for other notes. This came to head in 1931. Here's the proof straight from the horses mouth ... https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/155700/response/380147/attach/html/3/1.pdf.html  and .... https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/8097/response/20357/attach/html/2/9%20114%20Reply.pdf.html

What happened was after the Stock Market crash of 1929 lots of the creditors for the UK began to demand it's money be paid back. The UK had to pay out tons of money - real money, meaning gold and silver reserves. This is evidenced if you look at the Hansard records of parliament for 1931 http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/sittings/1931/ . The UK government was dissolved by the King, and then a national government was formed. As the UK no longer had anything left to back up the Bank of England notes it then had to go through a process of recapitalisation. This is a process that is one of the possible solutions for a company that is insolvent i.e. no longer able to pay it's debts. recapitalisation means that the company has to find a new source of funding or assets to back it up. So for a normal business this could mean re-mortgaging a factory. The Bank of England had to find something to back up it's notes with in-case anyone came asking to convert their 10 and 20 pound notes back into silver or Gold. Anyone who read the Freedom of Information response that I linked to earlier carefully you will have realised that since 1931 the BOE notes have been backed by what's known as securities. Now, a security in financial terms is a type of agreement. A 3 year old will be able to tell you that it is impossible to have 10 pounds (in weight) worth of agreements, but every BOE note still says to this day 'the bank of England promises to pay the bearer on demand the sum of....'

Now for a bit of science behind debts....

There is a 70 year debt cycle which is related to the cycle of precession. Precession is a cycle of the star systems of the zodiac around the pole axis of the Earth. It takes approximately 25,000 years to complete one full cycle of precession, and the cycle stays in each sign for approximately 2000 years. The 2000 year time period is called an 'Age'. This is what is meant when people say that we are now in the age of Aquarius, as the cycle as recently left Pisces and is now in Aquarius. The cycle of precession moves 1 degree out of it's total 360 every 72 years, So this is where the relation between debt cycles and astrology comes in. In fact everything in economics is based on the workings of nature, but more on that other time.

So around every 70 years nations will have to do something to try and gain funds to pay back some of the debts that they owe, so they can sustain their credit ratings at a level that is enough to convince the lenders (international banking organisations) that they are worthy of loaning more funds to. As an example of this,  in 1933 the USA announces the 'new deal' where all of the gold was taken in by the Federal Reserve, to pay back all of the loans that had been cashed in after the 1929 crash. Around 70 years before this it's 1860 and near the start of the Civil War. 70 years before this we have the USA constitution coming into play in 1789. 70 years after the new deal/stock market crash we have Y2K in the year 2000 and 9-11 in 2001.

The cycle is different for different jurisdictions and nations. In Britain if we begin in 1694 with the founding of the Bank of England, we can then move around 70 years forward to 1765 when the controversial Stamp Act was introduced, and the in 1770 James Cook claims New South Wales, in Australia for Britain. Fast forward another 70 years, and in 1840 we have the first major act in establishing New Zealand, with the controversial Treaty of Waitangi being signed, the Province of Canada is established, and Hong Kong is claimed by the British via the Treaty of Nanjing. Another 70 years on and we have the Knickerbocker stockmarket crash in 1907, the establishment of National Insurance in the UK with the 1911 National Insurance Act, and the immense curtailing of the powers of the House of Lords to veto legislation coming from parliament with the 1911 Parliament Act. Fast forward another 70 years and we are now into the eighties, and what do we get in the eighties?...A whole load of privatisation....

....The beginning of eighties sees Britain start the Falklands War (1982), and the beginning of the biggest wave of privatisation in Britain since the enclosures of the 1700s.

Here is a list of the institutions and governmental organistaions that were privatised in the 1980s (from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_privatizations#United_Kingdom)....

Amersham International (1982)
Associated British Ports (1983, 1984)
British Aerospace (1981, 1985)
British Airports Authority (1987)
British Airways (1987)
British Airways Helicopters (1986)
British Gas (1986)
British Leyland
Alvis (1981)
Coventry Climax (1982)
Danish Automobile Building (1987)
Istel (1987)
Jaguar (1984)
Leyland Bus (1987)
Leyland Tractors (1982)
Leyland Trucks (1987)
Rover Group (1988)
Unipart (1987)
British Rail Engineering Limited (1989)
British Shipbuilders (1985 - 1989, shipbuilder companies sold individually)
British Steel (1988)
British Sugar (1981)
British Telecom (1984, 1991, 1993)
British Transport Hotels (1983)
Britoil (1982, 1985)
Cable and Wireless (1981, 1983, 1985)
Council Houses (1980–present, over two million sold to their tenants) - see main article Right to buy scheme
Enterprise Oil (1984)
Fairey (1980)
Ferranti (1980)
Harland and Wolff (1989)
Inmos (1984)
Municipal Bus Companies (1988–present, bus companies sold individually) - see main article Bus deregulation in Great Britain
National Bus Company (1986 - 1988, bus companies sold individually)
National Express (1988)
National Freight Corporation (1982)
Passenger Transport Executive Bus Companies (1988 - 1994, bus companies sold individually)
Rolls-Royce (1987)
Royal Ordnance (1987)
Sealink (1984)
Travellers Fare (1988)
Trustee Savings Bank (1985)
Vale of Rheidol Railway (1989)
Water Companies - see main article Water privatisation in England and Wales
Anglian Water (1989)
Northumbrian Water (1989)
North West Water (1989)
Severn Trent (1989)
Southern Water (1989)
South West Water (1989)
Thames Water (1989)
Welsh Water (1989)
Wessex Water (1989)
Yorkshire Water (1989)
British Petroleum (1977, 1979, 1981, 1987)

You'll also notice if you click on the Wikipedia source for that list that the UK has by far the largest list of privatised organisations compared to other countries.

So, all of the above organisations (plus lots more in the 90s) were sold off to help pay back the debt that the UK owed to international banks at the time. As all of these organisations were nationally owned i.e. owned by the people of Britain, then naturally if they're sold to someone else then people that owned them i.e. me and you, should receive some sort of share of that money - right? This of course never happened, but more on that another time.

The privatisation of national institutions was not limited to that list. One of the other major institutions which was privatised which no-one really mentions is football. Up until the early 1990s top flight football in England was free to watch. There wasn't the plethora of matches on TV that are shown today as having the cameras and staff to cover so many matches is expensive, and would have been even more expensive back in the 1980s/early 90s. But, at least once a week, if my memory serves me correctly, there would be a live match from division 1 on terrestrial TV. All FA Cup games were also on terrestrial TV, as were the European matches too.

Having been born and grown up in England there are some things that no-matter how much you learn, because there is a part of you that has seen things be a certain way from when you were very young, you will still be surprised by when you see them happening, or potentially happening, and this for me is one of those things. It's a similar thing for me when it comes to the FA Cup - FA Cup finals were always the highlight and grand finale of the footballing season. For a whole week before there would be build up and anticipation for the game, and then on the day all other football would stop, and the whole day's coverage on TV would be devoted to this one match. Now, you have premier league games being played on the same day, the kick-off time has been moved to late afternoon, and it almost seems like just another game.

To fully understand the privatisation of football in England you have to go back to the 1970s when English football began to be very dominant in Europe, and the first discussions for satellite TV in England were being had....

In the 70s the government began to talk about offering bids for licenses to broadcast satellite tv in the UK. This would be beneficial for HM government (aka the City of London) for two reasons - firstly they can make money from the licenses, as people will probably be willing to pay for extra TV which makes it a viable business venture for companies to have a go at. Secondly, they want to sell off/privatise football - now, if they just turned around one day and said to the nation 'You know what, last year we were broadcasting all this football to you for free, but this year we want you to pay 5 quid a match to watch it' people would just go nuts, protest, and basically just not have it. So, they let Sky start it's business, then they took the top 20 clubs in the country and put them into a new business of their own called 'The Premier League' so that it can now negotiate rights to broadcast separately from the rest of the football league. Sky then waltzes in and outbids everyone for the rights to show the premier league, and hey presto you are now paying to watch what last year was free but to the man in the street it looks like things just sorta happened, and it's either fork out and watch your favourite team, or don't pay and miss out.

From that moment on we have seen football become more and more of a business with clubs floating on the stock market, being sold to foreign investors, and in some cases being totally rebranded to the point where they completely change the city that they play in.

Here's details of more privatisation that has happened in the UK....

'Enclosure' is another way of saying 'privatisation', so this is something that has been happening for a few centuries, not just decades. Research the enclosures of land in the UK during the 1600s, 1700s, and 1800s. Land used to be part of what was known as the 'commons' - a feudalistic legal term, relating to things that were free to use in anyway people chose by pretty much everyone - even though technically it was a feudalistic system it was still a lot better than the situation we have now where the government/crown/whichever name the greed-driven individuals who try to wield control want to give themselves this week claims to 'own' the vast majority of the land in the UK. The park-like Commons that we have now e.g. Clapham Common, are a remnant of what is left from those days.

Royal Mail was privatised via the 2011 Postal Services Act. This act turned Royal Mail into a corporation which was able to be listed on the stock exchange. The majority of the the shares have been purchased by private firms, and the UK Government (technically a corporation in itself) has retained 30% worth of shares.

The privatisation of the NHS has been a lot less blatant than what has happened with Royal Mail. As it was likely to create a lot more uproar if it was formally announced that the NHS was going to be privatised, the method used has been to split up the services provided by the NHS and sell those pieces off to the highest bidders who will then take over responsibility for providing those services. One report claimed that 70% of contracts that were put out for tender between April 2013 and December 2013 had been won by private companies, including one contract that was worth £1 billion. In order to aid the smooth transition from public to private ownership with a little backlash from the public as possible, HM government has let the companies which win the contracts use the official NHS logo, so someone who is unaware of the tender will probably still think that it's a publicly run service.

This tactic is reminiscent of the way that London Transport has been privatised. London Transport is run by a company called 'Transport for London' - a name which suggests that it's actually a nationalised, government company, when in-fact it is a private corporation which HM government call a 'PPP' (Public Private Partnership). The mayor of london is a chair on the board of the company, which I'm sure is very cosy for him. Transport for London has been responsible for introducing the money-spinning congestion charge, as well as the Oyster Card payment system, which although it has sped things up for the majority of people who live in London, can be an annoyance for anyone who doesn't, and therefore doesn't know how the system works, and is, at the end of the day, another method used to try and move people further away from using metallic based currencies, which have numerous benefits for the people using them, and more onto an electronic credit based system where it is even easier to control the movement and supply of 'money'.

The final straw for me came when I was watching newsnight a couple of weeks ago and Noel Edmonds popped up talking about how he and a consortium of other 'like-minded' people wanted to buy the BBC  (see these links for more http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/noel-edmonds-wants-buy-bbc-3256301, http://www.theguardian.com/media/mediamonkeyblog/2014/mar/17/noel-edmonds-bbc-takeover, http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/18/noel-edmonds-bbc_n_4983449.html?utm_hp_ref=uk&ir=UK). Now, I consider myself a realist, and even though I know that the so-called government is just a corporation, and therefore an organisation who's main aim is to make a profit, it still really take me back when I actually heard the possibility that something like the BBC could just be sold off to someone who pays enough money.

The flipside of all of this is the fact that as people become more and more disillusioned by the whole system more and more people have realised that the best way to do things is to start our own services, such as learning centres, healing centres, and maybe one day even football leagues too.

The Foreign Origin of Everything English

So I'm reading David MacRitchie's 'Ancient and Modern Britons' (very informative book), and in one section he talks about Morris dancing, it's ancient origins, and how it's still performed today. Reading this part of the book reminded me of something I had thought about a few years back regarding not only Morris dancing, but also many other things which are traditionally thought of as being 'English'.

My trail of thought began when there was a news story a few years back about a TV show that, for some unknown reason, is quite popular called 'Downton Abbey' (I've thankfully never seen it). Apparently it's a fictional show about a quiet English town and the things that go on there. The news story came about due to the fact that the show didn't have anyone in the cast who looked remotely 'foreign' - everyone was Caucasian, and while some people felt this didn't represent the true nature of the population in England, the producers had come out and said that it was reflective of a 'typically' English village, or something like that.

So, me knowing how much B.S., and how ignorant that statement is, due to the fact that most 'English' people know that a vast a mount of their ancestors came over during the Viking/Danish immigrations after the collapse of the Roman Empire, it got me thinking about all the other 'English' things which are really foreign. So here goes...

Tea - A cuppa tea is very English, and perhaps the national drink next to Beer - Tea originated in China

Fish and Chips - Jewish

Cricket - Invented in India (though it could be said that all ball games are derived from the Olmec Ball Game, so take your pick)

Football - Romans had a game called Harpastum. The Chinese claimed to have invented football before the Olympics in Beijing. It was the modern rules which were invented in England.

Morris Dancing - Moorish Dancing

Oxford University - founded by a guy to went over to Al Andalus (Spain) during the middle ages, learnt from the Moors about how to run a University like the one in Salamanca, and then came back to England and founded Oxford Uni

The Royal Family - Germans - Originally the house of Saxe-Coburg Gotha - changed to Windsor before the wars so that British people wouldn't turn on them

The English language - a combination of French, Arabic, Sanskrit, German, and lots more. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lists_of_English_words_by_country_or_language_of_origin

English People - John Beddoe, who was the professor of Ethnology at Oxford University during the late 1800s found that studies of the hair and eye colour of English people showed that a vast percentage of British and Irish people have Asiatic/African origins. The further west you went the more prominent this was.

The most popular dish in England is Curry.

Beer - goes back to Ancient Egypt

England (the name) - the land was originally called Albion. The origin England or 'Land of the Angles/Angels' was, and still is in America - New England

The Many Meanings of Heru

Heru is the son of Aser (Osiris) is the Egyptian pantheon...OK, so this is based on 3 rules of languages...1. Vowels are interchangeable in words 2. The letters h, g, j, f, and ph combined are interchangeable 3. The letter H can sometimes be dropped ....

Heru = Hero (Peace to Aseer the Duke of Tiers for that one)
Heru = Horo (Horoscope)
Heru = Horu = Horus
Heru = Hira = Hiram
Heru = Heiro = Hieroglyphics
Heru = Haro = Harrow (Place and posh private school in London were many politicians etc went to (also Mr Harrow in Boardwalk Empire))

Heru = Jeru (the Damaja, also Jerusalem)
Heru = Guru
Heru = Pharo = Pharoah
Heru  = Fero = Ferrous = Iron (Ironman)

Heru = eru = erudite (great knowlegde)
Heru = ero = Eros (Cupid), son of Aphrodite (Isis - Aset) Cupid also carries an 'arrow' (H-arrow = Haro = Heru)
Heru = Ora = Oracle (O - Ra - Ka - El) = Oral (Word of God) = Ore (Rock containing precious minerals e.g. Gold)
Heru = Ura = Uranus