33 Whigmore Street

There's a street in London called 'Whigmore St'...this building happens to be at number 33....

Latest Painting....'The Empress'

Just finished the final touches on my latest painting. It's called 'The Empress'....it's taken about 9 months to finish, and it's my first major piece that I have created entirely from my own imagination...enjoy :)......

Holographic Universe

So, the whole universe is actually in-fact one giant hologram - I thought I'd just kick off this post by going in straight at the deep end - it seemed like the best way. For those who don't know what a hologram actually is oxford online dictionaries define it as 'A three-dimensional image formed by the interference of light beams from a laser or other coherent light source'...to put it in layman's terms a hologram is an image which is produced by light, and looks different depending on the angle that you view it from. So the image on a TV isn't a hologram as if you move to the side of the screen and view it from an angle the image still looks that same. If you do the same thing for a tree or a person, then you will see a slightly different image as you move around it. This is simple stuff I hear you say - of course when you move around a tree it's gonna look different from different angles - it's 3D, that's what 3 dimensional objects do, however bear in mind that a hologram is also a 'projection' from a 'light source'.

So let's look at those two other aspects of holograms, and explain them in relation to the universe: First, let's look at 'light source' - light is energy, and most conscious people already know that everything is made out of energy. So that's cleared that one up. Ok, so what about the projection part - if the universe is a projection of energy that we perceive as mostly 3 dimensional objects, then where is this projection coming from. The answer is closer than you think. The projection is coming from you - us, everyone. Now this is where it gets a bit deep. Our minds are constantly projecting out thoughts, like a radio broadcast antenna. These thoughts are actually projections of energy, similar to when you drop a stone into water and the ripples go out. Our thoughts go out from ourselves, and not only to they help to shape the environment/universe, as our thoughts permeate far and wide (especially positive thoughts, which are more powerful than negative ones), but they also provide the actual particles that the universe is made up of. Think about it - we are constantly taking in energy in different forms - food, water, air, sound, light - the last two are absorbed by our bodies not only through our eyes and ears, but through our entire bodies, which is why we tan (highly melanated and non-highly melanated people all included) when in the sun for long periods. All of that energy that we absorb has to be put out somehow, and we put it out via breathing, sweating, excretion (sorry, if you're having lunch :), speaking (sound waves), and thinking. Melanin (or Carbon) is a superconductor, which is why we as highly melanated people are the most influential people in terms of shaping the universe - we actually shape and create the universe with our thoughts, and words ('let there be light').

If all melanated people in the world concentrated on the same thing for 20 minutes, that thing would happen. When one of use does it, it still happens, but it takes what seems like longer (I'll expand on the illusion of time in another post) to manifest as there are so many other thoughts, some of which may be conflicting, for our own thought process to navigate through.

Here's a scientific article based on what I have just been talking about if you wanna research further - you can also look up Sonia Barrett on youtube, as she talks a lot about this subject

http://rt.com/news/space-evidence-universe-hologram-195/

Divine Retribution for professional Brazilian football

So Brazil, once the benchmark by which all football related flair was judge have been astonishingly humiliated at a World Cup semi final that they staged in their own backyard. From the moment the first shambles of a goal went in, an incredible weakness within the Brazilian team's ranks was exposed, and the German team ensured that this one one humiliation that Brazil's national team would not be able to duck, or cover up. For me, the nature of the defeat, if defeat is even enough of a word to describe what happened to the Brazilian national team last night, makes the likelihood of divine intervention in last night's events the most plausible explanation for what transpired. Never before in a game of that magnitude have I witnessed a demolition such as the one which I witnessed during the first half of last night's semi final. Brazil shipped 5 goals in the space of around twenty minutes - this is the kind of thing that you would expect Germany or Brazil themselves to be doing to a Faeroe Island or San Marino team, and even now, to be fair to the development of those teams, this kind of spectacle would be unlikely to occur.

It wasn't just the fact that they shipped 5 goals so quickly - it was also, for me, the manner of the goals. Brazil looked weak, and afraid - they could hardly pass the ball to each other. None of Germany's goals in the first half (I don't know about the second half, cos I had switched off by around 60 minutes) were 30 yard screamers, or thunderous headers, or involved any pieces of incredible skill - three out of the five goals, if I remember correctly, were simply passed into the net by the German players.

Divine retribution is the most likely explanation for me as professional Brazilian football, as an industry, has for decades now committed numerous offences against the national people of Brazil, and now I'm going to go through a few of them....

1. Firstly, it must be remember that 8 workers passed form whilst working on building the stadiums for this world cup. This is something that I haven't heard mentioned once throughout all of the coverage of the tournament, and being a football lover, I have watched almost every game of this tournament. It would have been fitting for the players, or officials, or both to do some kind of memorial for those workers at the beginning of the tournament, and if they did do one then I apologise, but having watched the whole of the opening ceremony, again, I did not see one mention for them. May they rest in peace.

2. The cost of staging the world cup. This article by the Bleacher report http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1845944-how-much-has-hosting-the-world-cup-cost-brazil says that Bloomberg have estimated the cost of staging the tournament to be around $14 billion. There were riots and mass protests last year about this very subject. Who's knows how much Fifa has made from it, over and under the table.

3. The lack of Moorish influence in the Brazilian national team. Throughout the decades every brazilian national team has been very melanated. If you look at the pictures of the nationals teams I've shown below you'll see that most of them are made up by at least 50% of very melanated players. It does however, become less melanated as the teams get closer to the modern day, and the team which played yesterday was arguably the least melanated a Brazil team to have ever contested a world cup semi final, and let it not be forgotten that Pele himself is highly melanated Moor...

1958

1962

1966

1970

1974

1978

1982

2014

"Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land"

4. Then we have the concentration on a European style of play. Why would the 5 times winners of the world cup feel that they need to change their style of play in order to 'keep up' with the rest of world in terms of football? There is a lot more to the Brazilian adoption of the European style of play, and desire for their players to be more 'physical' in build than I will go into at this time - that can be left for it's own post. But I will say now that it is my reckoning that it is related to the rise of German football, and later Spanish football, as well as the Nazis who went to Brazil in operation Paperclip. Needless to say that the change of style has clearly been unbeneficial to the success of the national team.

5. Nike's sponsorship of the Brazilian national team. For a more in depth look into this point check out this article from the Guradian http://www.theguardian.com/media/2001/jul/09/marketingandpr.worldcupfootball2002. Brazil reputedly had/have a contract with Brazil that Nike can chose 5 internationals for Brazil to play each year where at least 8 first team regulars must be present. Getting involved with Nike, for any sportsman or team is never a good idea, and it is no coincidence that Brazil's decline has correlated with their increased involvement with Nike.

Useful and Information Moorish Websites

With so many websites (including this one) that are now out there providing Moorish related information it can be hard to know where to go to find what you are looking for. Having read quite a few of them myself here's my list of the websites that I consider the most helpful and informative...

1. http://www.rvbeypublications.com/

This list isn't in any particular order of rank, with the exception of 1st place, which is taken by the undisputed champion that is RVBey Publications. Ran by the fantastic Rasmariah Bey, Taj Tarik Bey, Anaid El, and others it contains a wealth of moorish related information that is not only precise, and very accurate, but is also being continuously updated. On here you will find history and nationality lessons, news on current affairs, techniques on how to straighten out certain areas of your life in respect to the law, and my favourite aspect, many free to download letter templates that can be put to use in lots of different situations. Tons of respect goes over to them.

2. www.undergroundrailroadnet.com

Great source for DVDs

3. http://www.dralimelbey.com/united-washitaw-de-dugdahmoundyah-muur-nation-history.html

Fantastic history on the heritage of Moors, especially of the Washitaw in North West Amexem, and in particular Louisiana



...Now, here's a few which are not specifically aimed for Moors, but are really useful for conscoius people, especially those who are consistently active...


4. http://www.whatdotheyknow.com

A fantastic site which allows you to easily make freedom of information requests to any governmental body in Britain. It will manage the request for you, keeping you up to date with progress, and allowing you to easily follow up if you are having issues with your requests. Another fantastic aspect is the database of all other people's requests that you can search through and really find some very useful and interesting information

5. http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org

A fantastic Britannic based site which contains a very popular forum on a wide variety of topics concerning freedom, and law

6. http://www.fmotl.com/forum/index.php

Same as above. Not used as much by me, but still very popular in it's own right.



.....The next two are good websites for finding contact information for companies/corporations that you need to get things straight with....




7. http://www.saynoto0870.com/

Gives you landline numbers for companies for when you want to call them up to sort out your business. Contains a very large database of companies.

8. http://gethuman.com/

Provides multiple options for contacting companies (phone/emails etc). Very good for the hard to reach ones

A lifetime on Natural Foods

If you've ever read the start of the Bible, or even if you haven't, you will probably know about the poeple mentioned in the bible who live to all kinds of seemingly outrageous ages, such as living to be 300 years old and so on. After reading this information during the time that I tried to actually read through the bible, which was in my late teens (I got to about 20 pages in, which I still consider an achievement)  I thought, 'OK, well how could this have actually been possible'. This was not in a way where I was dismissing the information, but in a way where I tried to figure out situations where living to these kinds of ages could be possible. That got me thinking about all of the crap that we, as modern people eat right throughout our lives, and how if we didn't eat so much rubbish, that maybe living to those kinds of ages could be a possibility....

In my teens I was aware, as a lot of us I'm sure are, that most modern day packaged food contain a great amount of unnatural and processed ingredients, such as preservatives, colourings, flavourings, etc. Now we will eat these foods pretty much everyday, if you're living the typically modern life that is, and we also start to intake these foods from a very early age via things such as baby foods, etc. This is true of even some of the best home-cooking, which will usually, most likely involve some kinds of oils, or flours, or tinned ingredients. Then on top of this we have to add the fast foods, and takeaway style meals that we all typically will regularly have when growing up in western society - things such as McDonalds, Fish and Chips, etc.

A lot of us will start to drink alcohol from around the age of 9 or 10 - obviously (and hopefully) not binges or even say whole cans of beer, but maybe a taste of some wine from our parent's glass during a special occasion, or maybe your mum, like mine, would give you a bit of Guinness every now and then. When we hit or teens we then have the ritual (at least in Britain) of going to the park with your friends, with a cheap bottle of cider, and basically just getting drunk for the fun of it. Combine this with drinking at parties, and so on, and by the time we are in our late teens we've developed quite a taste for alcoholic drinks. Finally, add on top of this the smoking, either of cigarettes, or weed, which is now tainted to very undesirable levels with chemicals, and what we end up with is a person who by the time they have hit the age of 20 has already put a vast amount of crap into their bodies.

Now this behaviour, for many of us, continues for many years afterwards (or at least it used to, a lot of us have become a lot more health conscious). This is not to mention the unnecessary stress of modern life, and things such as car pollution etc - if our diet was as good as it could be from the very start of our lives, i.e. eating natural foods, what would the difference be to our lifespans? For a bit of evidence of this check out this Moor, Annette Larkins https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qTWC2xIIsRs who has lived on fruit and vegetable juices from many years, and who is now in her 70s, but looks like she's in her 40s

....if we just looked at the foods that we eat, and say for each year we live, our western diets take off one year from our lifespans, then, with the so-called average life span being 75 (though I know of one lady who recently celebrated her 100th birthday, so you have to take western averages with a pinch of salt) then if we didn't have all of the crap that we eat throughout our lives we would be living to age 150 - that's just living the same lifestyle but with a vastly improved diet - improve the lifestyle, and who knows what age we could live to.

I have only talked about removing the obvious things from our diet in this post, but there are also many other things which could be improved which may not be so apparent. I advise readers to check out electric foods, alkaline foods, and the work of Dr Sebi, for tons more great information in this area.

Scottish Independence

So with all the news about Scottish independence currently going about I thought I would throw in my 2 cents worth about the subject and at the same time provide a bit of an explanation as to the reasons why this has come about now. This subject, in my opinion, is much more far reaching than is being reported, and it has already had very large consequences in this country...

The basis of Scottish independence is the Treaty of Union 1706 in-which, the story goes, that the Kingdom of England united with the Kingdom of Scotland to form Great Britain, and what would later become the UK or United Kingdom of Great Britain (it wasn't in any way as straightforward as that, as we will see later). So fast forward on to today - the Scottish National Party want to be independent from the UK, and apparently there's going to be a referendum in Scotland about whether to go independent in September. Now, Scotland could only become independent if the treaty was up, or nullified, and in my opinion, based on my research, the treaty is already up, and I will now explain a bit more and provide evidence to back up this statement....

The treaty was formed in 1706 (it was the 'Act' of Union that was passed in 1707). Now the way that the UK government and Monarchy, etc are run is largely Hebrew in nature. For example, you may notice if you look up some treaties from around the 1700s or 1800s that in the introductory section of the treaty they give praise to the 'Most High' - this is a Hebrew term for Ellyon - a deity. There are many other aspects of the government and monarchy which are based around Hebrew culture (e.g. the Banks and the English language itself), but I won't go into them all here. In Hebrew tradition there is something called a 'Jubilee' (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilee_(biblical)). A jubilee states that there are fifty years for an agreement governing the ownership of land to last, and it is in the forty ninth year (which is 7 cycles of 7 years) that a decision is made whether to re-institute the agreement or end it. So, based on the Jubilee cycle, if you kept on going forward in cycles of 50 years from the time the treaty was signed you would eventually reach the year 2006. Obviously, then the 49th year for that particluar Jubilee would be in 2005.

So 2005 would have been the most recent year for the decision to have been made whether or not to continue with the treaty. Now if you have a close look at what was happening, government wise, in 2005 you will find some very interesting things...firstly, and foremost you had a piece of legislation being passed which abolished the feudal land system in 'Scotland' (see... http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2000/5/contents). The feudal (or 'fee' dal) system, for those who don't know is basically the system of land ownership that the vast majority of people living in the western world would have grown up in, whereby the 'state' or Monarch or whoever, claims ownership of all of the land in a country, and then the people or 'citizens' have to pay to live on it - so this system includes the use of mortgages, the of renting property, council tax, etc. Now, passing this kind of legislation is obviously the 'government' saying 'we no-longer have any claim on the land', and to do it in just 'Scotland' is a very big sign.

The second piece of major legislation that I will provide as evidence that the treaty is over is the constitutional reform act of 2005. A major effect of this act was the establishment of a supreme court for the UK, but something else that it also done which I am more interested in is the demotion of the Lord Chief Justice. The Lord chief justice was, prior to the the act, the person in charge of the queen's bench division of the uk court system. The Queen's bench is the 'de jure' court in the UK (or it was prior to 2005). Many other scholars, and lecturers have pointed to the queen's bench as the place to go if you want to work with real law i.e. natural law, as opposed to the commercial law that is in practice in the other 'de facto' courts such as county court, magistrates court, etc. The queen's bench is really run by the monarch, but she or he can appoint someone to act in her place which is why we had the lord chief justice. If you watch the HBO TV series 'Game of Thrones' then the queen's bench would be the equivalent of when the farmers and other townspeople were bringing their greivances and problems to Kalisi after she decided to stay and rule in Meeren. So the queen's bench is like the old time court from before the running of the country (Albion) was taken over by the city of London (the crown).

Now, back to the reform act....the act created a new position called the 'president of the queen's bench' which is currently filled by a guy called Igor Judge. This removed the Lord Chief Justice from the Queen's bench and demoted him to only being head of the court system of england and wales. So, to summarise what actually happened....under the treaty, prior to 2005, the lord chief justice was the head of the UK court system, as the UK was coming to an end there could no-longer be a head of a UK court system, so a new position was created (president of the queen's bench) which now covers the re-instigated Albion aka Alba aka Scotland, and the lord chief justice got bumped down to only being head of England and wales.

A bit more evidence pointing towards the UK coming to an end in 2005...Here are a few governmental agencies which were also formed in 2005 or around that time period....

HMRC
HM Passprt Office (formed in April 2006)
National archives merged with the office of public sector information in 2006

...as you can see, some very integral agencies were re-formed during this time period.

Now to connect the 7/7 incidents with all of this....well firstly you have to understand that the 'idiot circus' as I like to call them, or those better known as the 'establishment' try to use rituals as a means to invoke some sort of power directed towards whatever plan they want to achieve. This can come in many different forms, such as a music concert, a meeting between heads of state, or, as has often been done in the past, a staged so called 'terrorist' attack, or an event of a similar nature. For more in-depth coverage of these types of events, as well as commentary or many other subjects of note, I advise you to listen to the Super Heru Radio show by Aseer the Duke of Tiers http://www.blogtalkradio.com/the-duke-of-tiers.

The jubilee tradition states that on the tenth day, of the seventh month, of the seventh year a trumpet should be sounded. Well it wasn't quite the tenth day of July that the 7/7 bombings happened, but it was the seventh month (July) of the seventh year, of the seventh cycle (since 1956) plus, due to the bombings the UK was asked to observe a 2 minute silence on the 10th of July.

So based on all of the evidence presented above, it is my opinion that the treaty of union ended in 2005. Anyone who has further evidence for or against this then please feel free to comment below. The treaty being over would have massive consequences for the people of this nation. I'll have more on that in another post. Also, there would be very significant ramifications for the city of london corporation, i.e. the crown, a lot of which I am still working out myself, and I'll be sure to post on here as soon as I reach any major conclusions.